7
Easter B May 20, 2012
Acts 1:15-17, 21-26 Psalm 1
1 John 5:9-13
John 17:6-19
You have seen the four letters
WWJD, meaning what would Jesus do? WWJP
could mean What would Jesus pray?
WWTAOJTTJWP would mean, What would the author of John think that Jesus
would pray? And with all of these unpronounceable
alphabetic acronyms, I hope that I am confusing you.
Today in our Gospel lesson we
have the longest recorded prayer of Jesus.
It is not in any other Gospel.
And one wonders how in the days when there were no hidden microphones,
how such a verbatim prayer of Jesus could have been remembered by someone
particularly if Jesus was praying alone.
The sheer logical confusion does
invite us to look at the oracular function in the early Christian
community. How did the early followers
of Jesus understand oracle or the channeling of the insights of Jesus within
the community long after he was gone?
Could the channeled words of Jesus through one of his followers be
regarded as the words of Jesus himself?
Such a question is only raised by us who live in the age of ownership of
so-called intellectual property.
The prayer of Jesus in the
seventeenth chapter of John requires us to ponder the conditional verb tenses
in if-then statements. The writer of John’s Gospel wrote the prayer
assuming a relationship with the risen Christ in this conditional mode: If
Jesus were here now, then he would be praying in this way. And now as we read it move to conditional
past-perfect tense: If Jesus had been present with the community of John, then
he would have prayed in the way that it is written in John 17.
I mean to be confusing because
art and oracle can make present those who are absent. Does Shakespeare become present when his
plays are read or performed? Does Mozart
become present when his music is played or performed?
The community of John took very
seriously this belief about being one with Christ and one with God the
Father. They believed that Christ was
their vine and they were branches and their branches were coursing with the
interior sap of the Spirit of Christ so that there was a sharing in their inner
life, the very life of Christ. And that
sharing of inner life could produce “words of Christ” and “prayers of
Christ.” And because of this oneness
factor, the spoken words and written words that came from the state of unity
with Christ could be regarded as the words of Christ or the oracle of Christ
who was alive and speaking within the community of followers.
Art and oracle confuse time; how
else could this Gospel quote Jesus as praying, “And now I am no longer in the
world….and while I was with them.” Where
is the physical location of such a Jesus who is praying these words? Where is Mozart when some musician is
channeling his music? Does Mozart attain
a trans-historical presence and immortality in his creations?
Today is Ascension Sunday; I
remind you that the Feast of the Ascension was celebrated on Thursday to a less
than standing room crowd. The ascended
Christ is the inspired imagination of the church’s dealing with the obvious
sense of Christ continuing presence even while he could no longer be seen or touched. But the ascended Christ could definitely
still be heard and could be known as a continuing oracle with the people who
gathered to pray in his name.
As we move on toward Pentecost
and Trinity Sunday, we see that it is Jesus who is responsible for the
Trinitarian confusion: “I and the Father are one,” said he. The Father-God aspect of the personality of
Jesus and his teaching of the Parent-God aspect of the personality of his
followers created this “alternate” family and this alternate way of being in
the world, but not just the world, but also an alternate world, the world into
which one was born by the Spirit of God.
Art, poetry and oracle confuse
time and space and for that reason I believe that the communities that
generated the New Testament writings as God’s word presented those words as an aesthetic
bending of the dimension of time and space.
The aesthetic bending of the dimension of time and space account for the
apparent logical confusion in the use of the same words in multivalent
ways. Take the case of the Greek word, cosmos or world.
Cosmos or world in John’s
Gospel is a world that is loved by God, but not supposed to be loved by the
followers of Christ. The kingdom of
Jesus was not supposed to be of this world; so the kingdom of Jesus was an
alternate and parallel world. The
followers of Jesus were to be in the world but not of the world. The writer of John’s Gospel believed that
Jesus taught us to live in two families, our natural and spiritual
families. Jesus taught us to live in two
worlds, the natural world and the spiritual world. The apparent confusion of language has to do
with the fact that every word can be interpreted from the point of view of the
natural world or from the spiritual world.
If we don’t understand this in John’s Gospel, we can find it to be a
very confusing book indeed.
Consistent with John’s Gospel
theme, “In the beginning was the Word” the Risen Christ is still the One who has ascended to a closer proximity
with his heavenly parent. And as the
older sibling, Christ is the one who prays words for us and for our success in
befriending each other toward the values of the Gospel. The Gospel of John portrays Jesus as an ever
present oracle of prayer who offers endless words of petition for our
well-being. In our recognition of Christ
as ever-present oracle, we in our attention to prayer try to enter into the words
of Christ who has gone to that other interior world which we can only partially
perceive and live in now but we can become more aware of it as we make the effort
to attend to this alternate world.
I hope that my words today have
confused you; made you bend time and space dimension not to some TV Twilight
Zone do-do-do-do reality, but to the reality of the sacred, which is a parallel
reality that all of us can experience in this very seeming “ordinary” world.
And if my words seem to confuse
you now, in just wait a few minutes and I’ll be selling you an even bigger Brooklyn bridge, when I hand you bread and wine and tell
you that they are the body and blood of Christ.
Good art, poetry and our
experience of their sublime effects seems to bend space and time and so does the
experience of the sacred. As we have
read what Jesus might have prayed, we see that the words invite us to know
another kind of relationship of oneness to a parent who is not an earthly
parent but who is a spiritual parent who is known because the metaphor borrows from the
notion of what an ideal parent-child relationship might be. What does a parent
want? A parent wants to be able to share
the very best with one’s child. Jesus
came to teach us that God wants to share everything of the Godly world with the
family of people who inhabit this earth.
Let us continue to go to the risen Christ as
our oracle; we need not claim that we have any infallible interpretations of
this oracle. We but ask for insights
from Christ as our oracle to get us through this day with the excellence that
we need to be the best we can be for the well being of the world that we live
in.
The writer of John’s Gospel believed that he
knew what Jesus would have prayed. And
now and you and I turn to Christ again as our oracle, and ask what Jesus would
pray even now? And what would the risen
Christ pray through us? To the answer of
this question we now give our lives.
Amen.