Sunday, November 15, 2015

Reclaiming Apocalyptic Thinking

25 Pentecost B 28   November 18, 2012  
Daniel 12: 1-3 Psalm 16
Hebrews 10:11-14 (15-18) 19-25   Mark 13:1-8



 

We are less than 48 hours away from the violent terrorist attacks upon innocent people in Paris France.  In our own memory, we have the 9/11 attacked upon the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.  We have in our memory the bombing of the Federal Office Building in Oklahoma City.  These experiences prove an indisputable fact:  Happenings of violence and of destruction and mass injury become what we call Events.  Events are actions which stand out from the ordinary everyday occurrences and demand public attention.  They demand public speculation.  They cry for many kinds of meaning to be projected upon them.  Why did this happen?  Why did this happen now?  Why did it happen to us?  Events of disaster provoke people to seek meaning.


  If we understand the ability for the chaos of destruction and violence to become events, we can understand the meaning and function of the apocalyptic literature in the Bible.  Because we assume the normalcy of peace and safety and goodness, the chaos of danger, destruction and violence demand that we find an explanation for why the normalcy of safety and goodness should be deprived.

  The Apocalyptic is the human impulse to try to make meaning out of the events of violence, war, terror and destruction.  As a human impulse, I would suggest that this is a universal characteristic of being human.   If we can begin to speak meanings about the events of evil and destruction, we are beginning to assert our response of control against the apparent forces of chaos.  The quest for the meaning of the event of chaos is a coping response; it is an effort to assert the primacy of goodness, justice and safety.

  When people become the targets of violence, there are events of substitution genocide.  If an entire nation or group of people can't be killed then how can a people be diminished?  In place of genocide, enemies try to dishearten a people by attacking their important symbols.

  We were told that one of the planes on 9/11 was headed toward the White House.  One plane stuck the Pentagon, the symbolic building of the American military.  The White House and the Capitol are perhaps the two most important symbolic American buildings.

  The Temple in Jerusalem was the most important symbolic building for the Jewish people.  And since it was a religious building made for the dwelling of the Divine presence, the destruction of the Temple was a way for the Roman Armies to say that the Jewish people and their God was powerless against the power of the Roman armies and the divinity of the Roman Emperor.

  The destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in the year 70 was an event which caused many people to speculate about the meaning of such an event.

  One of the ways in which the destruction of the Temple received meaning was in the "after the fact predictions."  If the destruction of the Temple was predicted then it could be seen as an event which did not elude divine sanction.

  How does a young person save face when he trips and falls in front of his peers?  He gets up and proclaims, "I meant for that to happen."  Such a declaration gives him a face saving sense of control in coping with his mishap.

  The oracle of Jesus which was being spoken within the early church after the Temple had been destroyed expressed a faith in God who would not be seen as powerless in this event of destruction.  Why the very God who allowed such a permissive freedom to allow Jerusalem and the Temple to be destroyed was the same God who also permitted God's people to go on and do new things.

  Did the Jews cease to be after the Temple was destroyed?  No.  They realized again that God could not be limited to a building; God was present in their gatherings.  God was present in their synagogues.

  Did the followers of Jesus cease to be after the destruction of the Temple?  Certainly not.  The Temple was a destroyed and the followers of Christ came to form a new Temple, the temple of the body of Christ.  The early Christian interpreters switched the temple theology to a body of Christ theology.  First, the body of Jesus was destroyed in death for three days but it became the body of the Risen Christ.  Further, the presence of the Risen Christ became birthed into the lives of many people who formed themselves into the living Body of Christ.

  Iin this apocalyptic event of the end of Jerusalem and the temple, there was a new beginning for a different kind of temple and a different kind of priestly ministry.  For the writer of the Letter to the Hebrews, Jesus became the high priest of a platonic heavenly temple who shared the priestly and intercessory role to a priesthood of all believers.

  So the apocalyptic event can become the event which requires faith to receive and articulate a new beginning towards love and justice.

  I believe we as Christian need to take back the apocalyptic truth from those who would make it trivial.

  What do many of the popular TV preachers do immediately after a disastrous event or event of terror?  Many of them immediately say that it means Jesus is coming soon.  Many of them say it is judgment because of the special sins of the people who they like to target and victimize, like secular humanists, feminists or gay people.  This ends up being an evil trivialization of the apocalyptic. In non religious culture, the apocalyptic has been moved out of religion into politics, art and entertainment.  Modern cinema and science fiction are dominated with a blend of futurism and apocalypticism.  We use literature and cinema to provide a catharsis to deal with events which in various ways threatens to end life as we currently know it.

  We should be more insightful in understanding biblical apocalyptic passages.  During Bible Times, politics, religion and entertainment were all unified in human experience.  They did not separate images of coping from their every day experience of politics and religion.  We need to appreciate this to understand that the apocalyptic had a different function in societies where the biblical literature of oppressed people was written.

  So how should we receive this Gospel today?  First of all, let us continue to pray as we always pray in the Lord Prayer, "Save us from the time of trial. Lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil."  This is another way of saying, Lord, we pray that we will be spared from ever needing the apocalyptic answer for comfort.  Also, even as violence and terror become significant events, let us have faith and vision to see that all of the things which are happening within the great Freedom of God, make the events of violence and evil to be seen to be infrequent and minimal.  They only stand out because they are not normal.

  And finally, the Freedom which allows many bad things to happen is such a great Freedom that it will provide for us a complete menu of new and gloriously wonderful things which co-exist with evil, but not only co-exist, they have the power to help us to overcome evil with the wonderful normalcy of goodness, justice, hope and faith.  Amen.  














No comments:

Post a Comment

Sunday School, November 24, 2024 Last Sunday after Pentecost, Christ the King, B proper 29

   Sunday School, November 24, 2024    Last Sunday after Pentecost, Christ the King,  B proper 29 Theme: Christ as a King A time for discuss...