Sunday, May 19, 2013

Pentecost Puppet Show: Happy Birthday Party of the Church


Gospel Puppet Show
May 19, 2013
Day of Pentecost

Characters:
Dovey the Dove
George


Dovey: (singing) Happy birthday to you, Happy birthday to you.  Happy birthday Christian Church.  Happy birthday to you!  And many more!

George: Why did you sing Happy Birthday to the Church Dovey?

Dovey:  Well today is the Day of Pentecost and the Day of Pentecost is the Birthday of the Church.  Let’s see the church is 2013 minus 33 equals 1980.   Happy 1980th birthday to the church.  But who’s counting?

George: Obviously you are counting.  We are a pretty old group of people.

Dovey:  Yes, you are one of the oldest and long lasting organizations that ever existed.

George: I wonder why the church has lasted so long.  Do you think that the church will still be here after I die?


Dovey:  Well George, you’re not going to die for awhile but yes the church will be here after you die to have more birthdays.

George:  How do you know Dovey?

Dovey:  Well, because even though you are a member of the church, the church is really not about you.

George:  Well, what is the church about?

Dovey:  The church is about Jesus Christ.  His message of love was so wonderful and it created so much excitement in people they called his message Good News or Gospel.  And Jesus said if we just keep sharing this good news to each new group of people who are born then this message will live forever.  This is why the church will continue to have birthdays forever.  Do you know what Pentecost means?

George:  Do I have time to Google it?

Dovey: Goo..goo…goo…Google it?  What’s that?

George:  It’s like a big storage brain outside of me where I store all of the information of the world and maps.  Google maps can even tell me where to go.

Dovey:  Well, I’ve got a built in Google maps and GPS.  Did you know that my family has been making a nest and laying eggs in the same tree for more than a hundred years.  I’ve got GPS in me that automatically tells me where to go.

George:  Wow, where did you get that?  That’s better than Google maps.

Dovey:  God made me this way and God the Holy Spirit is everywhere like a divine GPS system.  But the Holy Spirit became better known to everyone on the Day of Pentecost.

George: So what does Pentecost mean?

Dovey:  It means 50 days after Easter and it is the day when the Holy Spirit became known to the friends of Jesus.

George:  What happened on the Day of Pentecost?

Dovey:  Well, the Holy Spirit was discovered by the friends of Jesus and they were happy and joyful and they found that the Holy Spirit helped them to tell the Good News about Jesus in every language.

George:  So the Holy Spirit is like a great Google translator?

Dovey:  I guess you techies might say it that way.  Yes, the Holy Spirit is the wonderful personal energy of God’s love with us to help us to continue to tell the Good News about Jesus so that the church will continue to have birthdays into the future.

George: Wow!  Pentecost and the Holy Spirit are exciting.  But where are we going to get 1980 candles for the birthday cake?  Oh well, at least we can sing Happy Birthday.  Sandra, can you hit it on the piano and help us sing?

Everyone:  Happy birthday to you, Happy birthday to you.  Happy birthday Christian Church.  Happy birthday to you!  And many more!

George:  Do you think I can have some chocolate cake for the church’s birthday party?

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Prayer as Meaningful Discourse


7 Easter    C     May 12, 2013
Acts 16:16-34 Psalm 97
Revelation 22:12-14,16-17,20-21    John 17:20-26            

   If one says that something is true if and only if something can be empirically verified then this is a denial of lots of things that occur which are meaningful for us.  One can understand why people would want to put such a limitation upon truth.  It is an effort to control and certify meaning so that communication can be precise.  It is an attempt to bring the replication ability of the scientific method into all human use of language.  But really why would we want to do this even if we could?  If this were all that we aspired to in language then we might as well be happy that robots could take over, but human language gets colored in many more diverse ways in the fullness of human experience.  Moods, emotions, dreams, love, fantasies, music, intuitions and much, much more enter into our use of words and we are in fact complex language users with subtle upon subtle use of various discourses that arise from the endless variety of human experiences.  For us to limit meaningful truth to only what can be verified by scientific method would be a serious denial of what words do to communicate the fullness of human experience.
  Today’s Gospel is another reading from John’s Gospel on the Sunday after the Ascension.  And really all of the Gospels are post-Ascension word art that pertain the experience of knowing Christ in his resurrection.
  The events of the past are never empirical because as we relate the words about them, they are no longer here.  And everything before our eyes is rapidly becoming the immediate past tense much as looking at a river and assuming one is looking at the same water; oops, the water I was staring at has already gone downstream, the current flowing water only looks like what has already flowed past.
  And so we have recounted a prayer of Jesus, a prayer that Jesus would have said as it was shared by some people who believed that they knew Jesus rather well.
  John’s Gospel as I say endlessly is a confession about Word.  I find it very conducive to our postmodern period when we have begun to recognize the most obvious insight of all, namely, that words mediate every human experience.  Word accounts for the nano-second time delay between experience of something and the word that constitute our experience of something.
  The old insight was that things exist independently and before words rather than co-extensively and at the same time with people word-users.  Now we understand that things exist for us as humans because we use words.
  Let us try to force the prayer of Jesus into empirical only word use.  Jesus is praying?  Empirically it looks as though he would just be speaking to himself.  Or is he praying out loud so that his disciples taking dictation can record the words and then spend 2000 years trying to interpret a theology from the words of prayer by Jesus?
  Okay, by the content of the prayer of Jesus, Jesus is not just speaking to himself; he is speaking to a Being whom is addressed as Father.  And like Philip is quoted in the same Gospel as a preeminent doubter, we might ask Jesus, “Show us the Father and we’ll be satisfied.”  This is another way of saying, “Jesus, use language in only empirical ways and we will be happy.  Keep it simple.  Don’t go all poetic on us and refer to people and things that we cannot see.  Jesus, where is your Daddy to whom you are speaking?” 
 And of course Jesus had already answered, “If you have seen me, then you have seen the Father.”
  And this answer raises all kinds of questions for empiricists and monotheists.  An empiricist wants to say, “So Jesus you are Jesus and you are also Father and if you are Father, we assume that within your skin is the God the Father.”  So is not this an incredible limitation on where God could be? 
And if one is a radical monotheist, one believing that God could not be identified with anything in human experience since that would make God something empirical and thus limited and thus an idol.
  And of course we know the solution offered by the writer of the Gospel of John.  God is Word who is flesh in Jesus and Jesus gave us the model of how we are functioning, living and having our being in the reflexive play of words because the entirety of human life is constituted by a continuous performance of words about former words.  John’s Gospel is about how we find ourselves in the variations of how we know ourselves and our world in and through the word.
  Do you see how reflexive word is?  By word I say that I have human experience and then I turn around and say that it is human experience to use words.  We are caught in total circular word reflexivity and I think the acknowledgement of this is the great secret of the Gospel of John.
  Word is monumental; by word we attain the type of poetic oneness that Jesus was speaking about in his Prayer.  By word Jesus can say that he is in the Father and the Father is in him.  By word Jesus can ask that his disciples and all of the future disciples might be in the Father and in him.  But do you see how if one is a literalist about words and deny the explosive poetic meanings of word, how limiting this would be on Jesus as a user of language and upon us who desire to have the manifold expansive types of human experience that draw from us all many kinds of word use?
  So Jesus prayed that his disciples would be one and all in the future would be one.  And one wonder if it isn’t like a desperate request of mother about her children, “Can’t you all just get along?”
   The writer of John’s was well aware that there was a world outside of the writer’s community who did not understand his community and their language and their confession of a relationship with a risen Christ.  I believe that he was accounting for different language identity communities, something of what we call today a paradigm.  Why do bird of feather flock together?  Because they share a “paradigm” of word use that have them to believe that they are unified.  This happens in science, in politics, nationalism, in sports or any time there is a group identity.  What is it that gives group oneness or cohesion to a community?  It is an interior practice of a sense of agreement about how words unify around what is regarded to be a common experience.  The writer of John is very much aware about the unity that can come because of words.  Through words we get the closest to one another as is humanly possible.  The closest literal physical union between two people is in their child, but they lose their person identity because a new person comes into an independent existence.  So the way that people become closest is in the exchange of words; words go deeply into that mingling processing center within us and then goes throughout our entire being in becoming flesh in the action and presentation of our lives.  John truly understands the significance of Word and its vital comprehension of our lives.
  And if word is so vast as to encompass many discursive practices, can we admit that the discourse that we call prayer is a discourse that has a long history of practice in the history of humanity?  Prayer one of the best ways we can be involved with other people.  Sometimes it is better for us to express our thoughts about someone else to God rather than directly to the person.  Prayer is to practice a relationship with a person as preparation to actual interaction.
  Today is a day when we celebrate probably the most significant prayer force in the world, the prayer force of mothers.  Don’t mess with mother’s prayers, amongst other things.  The prayers of mothers are like long reaching tentacles that surround their children wherever they go.  The prayers are so pervasive probably most children ask first in all that they do, “What would Mom do or what if Mom is watching?”
   Let us remember today to accept the expansive use of word; let us not limit meaningful language to only what we can verify with our eyes.  Let us accept the discourse of prayer and accept that Jesus prayed and we should too as a way of acknowledging our visible and invisible connection with all things and everyone.  And because we have specific location within the group of people to whom we've been called let us pray for one another as we mobilize our desire for the mutual well-being of each other.
  And let us not get too theological and scientific about God and try to figure out God as Father and Son as theological doctrine.  Let us accept the example that Jesus called his inner guide, his Father and he invites us to this identity with our inner Guide and Parent whom we know as God.  And let us confess that we never want to be separated from God at all and so we can say like Jesus, if you have seen us you can see God as the originator of all life.  Amen.

Puppet Show for Mothers Day


Gospel Puppet Show
May 12, 2013
7 Easter   Mothers Day

Characters:
Jane
Henry


Father Phil:  Boys and girls, Jane and Henry are with us.  Can you give them a welcome.

Jane:  Henry, did you know that I have the best mom in the world?

Henry:  Are you sure about that?  I think that I have the best mom in the world.

Jane:  But my mom is so great, she’s like Jesus.

Henry: Well, my mom is great too and she’s like Jesus too.  How is your mom like Jesus?

Jane: Well, she’s kind to me.

Henry: So’s mine; she makes me waffles in the morning.  And remember Jesus fixed a fish breakfast for his disciples.

Jane:  Okay, but my mom drives me everywhere.  To school, to ballet, to soccer, to my friends house, to the movies and to get ice cream.

Henry: My mom drives me everywhere too.  How would we do anything if mom didn’t drive us?

Jane:  And my mom always makes my birthday special.

Henry:  So does mine and she also makes Christmas and Thanksgiving special for me and our family.

Jane:  My mom goes shopping with me and she helps me to pick out pretty clothes.

Henry:  Well, my mom shops for my clothing and she doesn’t make me go with her.  I trust her good taste.  And don’t you notice how I am such a fine dresser?

Jane:  I guess if you like twenty shades of denim, you’re a good dresser.
My mom gets me accessories and shoes, Dorothy shoes.

Henry:  My mom reads to me at night before I go to bed.  And she makes the stories so interesting.

Jane:  Well, my mom tells me stories about when she was young.

Henry: Well, my mom taught me how to cook my own eggs.  I can do them  “over easy.”

Jane:  Well, my mom taught me to ride my bike without training wheels.

Henry:  Well, my mom sings to me at night before I go to bed.

Jane:  Well, my mom taught me how to read.

Henry:  My mom, taught me how to do my arithmetic.

Jane:  My mom taught me how to spell.

Henry:  My mom bought me a brand new bike.

Jane:  My mom bought me new leotards and tutus for dance.

Henry: Well, I admit my mom never did that for me.

Jane:  So see, my mom is better.

Henry: Well has your mom ever bought you a toy truck?

Jane:  Well, no, I don’t want a truck.

Henry:  Well, I don’t want a tutu or leotards, touchee.

Fr. Phil: Henry and Jane, can we agree that you both have great moms?


Henry:  Okay.

Jane: Okay

Fr. Phil:  I know something else about your moms.

Henry: What’s that?

Fr. Phil:  Your moms pray for you, just like Jesus prayed for his friends.  Your moms pray for you all of the time.  They think about you when they are not with you.  And they love you and care for you and they want the very best for you.

Jane:  I think it’s wonderful to have a mom?

Henry:  Mom’s are the perfect delivery system for bringing us into the world.

Fr. Phil:  And after delivery the lifetime work of motherhood begins.  When you are forty or sixty or more you’ll still want to come home for the favorite dish that your mom cooked.

Jane:  I have a prayer today?

Henry:  What is your prayer today, Jane?

Jane:  Thank you God for my mother and for all mothers!


Henry: A thousand Amens to that prayer.  Can all of the children say Amen?

Children:  Amen!

Jane: And can the children say, “Happy Mother’s Day?”

Everyone:  Happy Mother’s Day.

Sunday, May 5, 2013

John's Gospel: Writing as a Technology of Memory to Keep the Word of Jesus


6 Easter   C       May 5, 2013             
Acts 14:8-18      Ps. 67
Rev. 21:22-22:5      John 14:23-29


    What is that both creates human lives as we know them  and then preserves then into the future?  It is our word ability.  What keeps animals from becoming extinct?  Their ability to continue to propagate their species into the future; for animals it is only a biological preservation.  With human being it involves a preservation of all that humans have attained in what we call human culture.  And human beings use word or language and language products to preserve what they can retain of human culture from one age to the next.
  What is a bee keeper?  Someone who tends to bees in hives in order to harvest the honey.  What is a zoo keeper?  A worker at a zoo who takes care of animals.  What is a house keeper?  A member of the household who takes care of the interior maintenance of a house.
  In our appointed Gospel lesson for today, we have a reference to word keeping.  “Those who love me will keep my word.”  That’s a quote from a discourse of Jesus unique to John’s Gospel.  Word Keeper?  What does that mean?   I’m as guilty as anyone in being sloppy often about word use and I think perhaps we often miss the meaning of word keeping in this Gospel lesson based upon what word keeping has come to mean in our English usage, which probably came about because of a misuse of this Gospel passage.
  In English if it is said that someone keeps their word, it means that they honor their verbal contracts but we normally only use this phrase in reference to the words that belong to the same person who is keeping them.  He keeps his word.  I keep my word.  But I don’t usually say that I keep someone else’s word.  And it would be a rare English expression for someone to ask me to “keep their words.”
  We probably are used to thinking that “keeping the word” of Jesus would mean to obey Jesus, but there is another Greek word for obey and that is not the word used in this Gospel lesson.  In earlier verses it was written that the disciples were asked by Jesus to keep his commandments.  This is a direct identification of Jesus as one who is greater than Moses when it comes to having commandments that should be regarded.
  But back to keeping the word of Jesus.  John’s Gospel is all about Word.  Word or the Greek word logos can be used in various ways.  It can mean a single word; it can be used as a collective plural as “entire” body of words; it can be used as a metaphor for what God is for us in trying to understand God.  The beginning phrase of John is “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.  And that Word also became flesh and dwelled among us.
  The dilemma of the community for whom the Gospel of John was written concerned how the reality, the life, the memory, the presence of Jesus would be retained or kept in this world.  Jesus was so special his disciples were concerned that his memory could die out just as the memory of the overwhelming majority of people who have ever lived has died out.
  The words that we read today in John’s Gospel were written to a previous question.  Judas   (not Iscariot) asked Jesus, “How are you going to make yourself known to us and not to the rest of the world?”  This question is really a dialogue analysis of the “staying power” of the remembrance of Jesus within the world.  You can appreciate the doubt of the question.  Jesus, if you don’t make it on the big stage of world history, like Julius Caesar did, how are you going to be remembered?  And how can our small little band of followers keep you alive in the world?
  And the answer is?  Jesus said that he and the Father and the Holy Spirit were all going to come and make a home in their followers.  Jesus had just said that in his Father’s house there were many dwelling places.  So Jesus was indicating that each body of his followers was to become an address, a location for the residence of the life of God as Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
  What was going on in the community of the Gospel of John?  They were taken up with the issue of the “staying power” of the memory of Jesus in their life and world.  They were well aware of the success of the Jesus Movement but at the same time they were not taking for granted the future presence of the memory of Jesus in the world.
  The punchline is this:  The quality of relationship and the re-creation of Godly presence in the life of each person wer so pronounced that it created such excitement as to be able to be transmitted through a continuous succession of words of Jesus from one disciple of Jesus to the next disciple of Jesus.
  We are so assuming about the doctrine of the Trinity that really did not become such a theological abbreviation for God until after the fourth century, that we forget the pregnant impact of the metaphor of the family of God becoming resident in one’s life as a continuing location of God’s presence in this world.
  If the Ford logo fell off one of Henry Ford’s car would it still have been made by Henry Ford?  Were the early members of John’s community worried about the label of God and Christ being removed such that their maker and originator would no longer be recognized?
  “Don’t worry” says the dialogical Jesus in John’s Gospel, “our the divine family brand is going to be all over you and in you and through you and this basic DNA of the family is going to be spirit-word within you and it will keep the Jesus-family brand alive and well for a long, long time.
  One of the major themes, in my opinion, of the Gospel of John has do with the word and how it is by the word that the identity of the community is going to remain connected with the identity of Jesus.
  In John, Jesus is the Christ, who is the Word of God, the same word that was spoken when the world of human beings came into being.  Jesus did not write books; Jesus spoke words.  Spoken words are harder to remember forever.  How do spoken words remain?  Oral tradition is passed on in spoken words that are reduced to mnemonic devices such as metaphors and stories.  Metaphors and stories are units of memory in oral traditions.  They help the listener be able to retain the gist of the conversation.  Oral traditions are not always precise and exact; they get slightly altered in transmission due to inexact human memory.  John’s Gospel is about anchoring spoken word of Jesus into a written word of teachings that Jesus would have said to help his followers to retain the importance of the mission of his life.  The punch line of John’s Gospel is about word as written word or as a more precise technology of memory for retaining exact words into the future.  This is what the Gospel of John has done; writing has retain exact words and these words limit the possible number of interpretations for these words and the faith meanings that they can come to have to people who read and hear them. You cannot say that John’s Gospel is written about Julius Caesar.
  The gist of the appointed Gospel is that the quality of the life of Jesus is so special that it could go from face to face contact; to personal witness existing in oral transmission and then into written word and the life of Jesus could be transmitted across history into the next generation.  And this has happened; we ourselves still try to account for the staying power of this transmission of the presence of Christ to us and in the many and varied way in which we have come to confess that God is Emmanuel, God is with us.
  Let each us accept that fact that we are individually a crowded house; God has taken up residence in us, set up home and it started because we were made in God’s image and now we just get to flat out confess it because God, Father, Son, Holy Spirit, Word, Comforter, Wisdom or the Great One by any name resides in those whom the Divine one has designed and created.  Jesus made this known is a special way and the memory of him has been retained in a profound way.  We may not understand the staying power of Jesus even as atheist, agnostic and all have to admit that Jesus has hung around for a long time.
  Without trivializing God’s presence in our lives let us accept it as the basic Mystery of our lives that we revere and live towards each and every moment.  Let us not be too proud about how we know God; let us be more grateful that we have the privilege to be humble dwellings for God in our world.  Amen.

Gospel Puppet Show: Dove as the Holy Spirit


Gospel Puppet Show
May 5,  2013
6 Easter

Characters:
Dovey the Dove
Fr. Phil

(Pictures of the Dove of Noah's Ark and the Dove of the Baptism of Jesus are posted on front of the puppet theatre)

Father Phil:  Today I want to introduce our guest for today.  Welcome please Dovey the Dove. 

 Dovey: Coo, Coo, coo, coo, coo, coo.  Hello, I’m a bit of a shy bird but I like to coo.

Father Phil:  Dovey, welcome!  You don’t have to be shy with us.  These children are very friendly.  Aren’t you friendly children?  Dovey, aren’t doves usually seen in pairs?  Isn’t that why you’re often called love birds?  So where is your love bird?

Dovey:  We do go around in pairs.  My husband is having a day out with the boys.  They know a farm that has just planted some new seeds and so they have gone to have a big feast.  I’m sure that he will put on some pounds today.

Father Phil:  I invited you here today to tell you that you are a very famous biblical bird and I wanted these children to know what you symbolize.

Dovey: Symbolize?  Sounds like a disease.  I don’t know if I want to symbolize.

Father Phil:  No, it’s a good thing.  It means that doves are so gentle and kind that they can teach us about the very best things about God and life.

Dovey:  Okay but what do I symbolize?



Father Phil:  Well, a dove was very important in the story of Noah’s ark.  The dove was like the first scout who left the ark after the flood and when the dove came back with a olive branch, Noah knew that the water from the flood had gone down enough to get out of the ark.

Dovey: Well, I did not know that a dove was a famous scout, though is that something like being a canary in a deep mine?

Father Phil:  No, it was a good thing to be a messenger for Noah and all of the animals on the ark.  It was good news to know that they could finally get off the ark.  But you have an even more important value in the Bible.

Dovey: What’s that?

Father Phil:  You are a symbol for God the Holy Spirit.  The Holy Spirit is God’s presence in this world that Jesus promised us after he left.  And there are lots of famous pictures of doves.

Dovey:  What kind of pictures?

Father Phil:  Well, the most famous one is when you fly down and light upon the head of Jesus at his baptism.

Dovey:  Doves don’t do that.  We’re too shy and frightened.  Occasionally we accidentally drop some stuff on people but we don’t land on people.

Father Phil:  I wish you hadn’t mentioned dropping stuff on people in church.

Dovey:  Oops….Sorry.

Father Phil:  But Jesus was so wonderful and doves are so gentle that a dove was the perfect symbol for God’s Spirit.  So that makes you very famous, being a symbol for God the Holy Spirit.

Dovey: Well that is pretty special.

Father Phil:  Jesus wanted everyone to know that God would still be with us after he left and so he said that God would remain with us as a gentle comforting dove, sort of singing a sweet coo, coo song to keep us peaceful.

Dovey:  Well, we do coo a lot.  And we are gentle.  We don’t like to fight.  Thank you for teaching me about the biblical doves.  I feel better about being a dove now.

Father Phil:  Thank you Dovey for helping us to learn about God the Holy Spirit.  Children, let’s give Dovey a big hand.

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Merely Anthropomorphizing in the Best Possible Way


5 Easter   C       April 28, 2013
Acts 11:1-18     Psalm 148
Revelation 21:1-6 John 13:31-35


  Do you ever talk to your plants?  Do you talk to your pets?  Why do you do it?  Do you understand your pet’s language?  Do you understand your plants?  Do you believe in animal whispering?  Plant whispering?  Can you do this without your sanity being called into question?
  We do lots of things in this life that are meaningful to us and yet we do not have the full scientific justification for doing them.
  We are but prisoners of human experience?  I am but a prisoner of Phil’s human experience?  How can I know non-human experience as a non-human? A dog’s life as a dog?   How can I know non-Phil human experience as non-Phil persons?  Your life and as you know it?  Even if I have “whispering” gifts, I end up translating the assumed experience of others into my own language of understanding.
  What is the nature of inter-species relationship?  What is the nature of inter-personal relationship?  What is the relationship between differences?
  From our prison of human experience and from my particular prison of Phil’s personal human prison, we confront the world with some questions.  Should the world feel what I feel or should I feel what the world feels?  Are both impossible?   The impossible assumption is that I can know what you experience and how you experience or that I can know how a dog feels or how my plants feel.  Yet the experience of faith is to live by the impossible; by believing and acting as though we can know how another being actually lives and feels.
   I love the expression of this assumption in the 148th Psalm.  This Psalm is an expression anthropomorphism gone wild.  The Psalm is conducting the orchestra of all Nature and imploring everything in heaven and earth to “Praise the Lord.”  Sun, moon, stars, wild beasts, wind, rain, fruit-trees, hills, mountains, young, old, men and women, kings and people of all kinds, Praise the Lord.  Can there ever be any more presumptuous anthropomorphism than this?
  But we live by this meaningful presumption all of the time.  And when we really do the impossible we live the very best.   Compassion and love represent the extreme faith event of empathy, presuming to walk a mile in the shoes of another person in such a way as to be able to honor their life with the high sense of adoration, veneration and care.  And all of this is based upon this impossible presumption, of being able to live beyond the limitation of Phil’s human experience.  Projecting myself as being in the skin of another.
  In the Gospel lesson, there is a reference to glory.  Glory is the kind of intensified fame, adoration, regard, or veneration that is given and received between different beings.  We give glory when we confront excellence and greatness.  When we can say, “Wow, this is so wonderful that I must confess its greatness.”  In the experience of praise or adoration, checking the ego at the door is not difficult.  These experiences happen to us when we have a brush with what we call the sublime; it happens in artistic performance, it happens in the experience of love, it happens at the oceans, in the mountains, in the forms of beauty in this world, in extraordinary performance, in heroism and in myriads of moments of the ego being caught off guard.  When we encounter the sublime, our egos are checked, we can offer voluntary praise and worship and adoration.
  Sometimes we are forced to check our egos through oppression, through suppression or through humiliation; but the best way for our egos to get checked is through an encounter where we can naturally confess excellence as it casts a spell over us wins us and whispers our ego to forget itself.  And in that moment we make room truly for another person and other beings in our life.
  Jesus gave an eleventh commandment, a new commandment, the commandment to love one another as a new standard of living.  The standard of love is the invitation to the impossible.  It is the invitation to live as though we can actually walk in the shoes of someone else and feels as they feel, even though we know the sheer impossibility of complete coincidence with the consciousness of another being.  What is the mystical event of passing over into the experience of another such that we can treat them with a different sense of care than we would if we did not experience this sense of empathy?
  I believe that what makes the biblical wisdom tradition an impossible scientific tradition is this impossibility of empathy; this sense of going out of ourselves into others and being with them in such a way that lets them know the experience of care.
  We certainly agree with science about the validity of empirical experience but in our mystical tradition we marvel that there is any ability at all for beings to have mutual experiences conducted between us.  And not only conducted between us but done so in a way that has generated words from experience such as sharing, caring, empathy and love.
  There is something about the ego and sense of self that often would like to make the epidermis an impenetrable barrier of separation, but there is something about the experience of greatness that can massage the ego to admit connection among all orders of being.  In this great order of being from the sub-atomic and molecule to all the unseen orders of the imagination we are able to experience the belonging of togetherness.  We assume that we are enough like each order of being enough to speak on behalf of all orders of being, and so as human, and in being human we speak on behalf of other orders of being.  We speak on behalf of animals and plants and angels and demons and God, and we do so as human beings, because we believe that connection is basic to our lives.  And we extend this relatedness to all orders of being; why indeed do we go to Mars and to the moon and send our eyes into outer space as far as we can reach..  We are curious about the full reach of how we might relate to all things.
  That is how we are made; we are made for the impossible to believe that we can speak for all things because in some way we are like all things and all beings. We believe that all things and beings are like us in some way.
  And that is where God comes in; we need a confession of a great Totality to exorcise the individual egos of all things and to convince us that we are not separate but all together and that we live best in living together well.
  So the Psalmist anthropomorphizes all Nature as we all do because we believe that we share enough in common with all of creation.  And we as people of faith believe that for all of nature to recognize God through worship and praise is the very best way for all of us to check our tendency towards separation before God’s greatness and believe that we are called to be together in the mutually beneficial ways of love and creativity.
  I believe that we can anthropomorphize, that we can treat everyone in a humanly way, because we share enough in common with all orders of life.  We as Christians, believe that God, theomorphized in the Jesus Christ, that is, God treated humanity as though it could be seen through the divine point of view.  In Jesus, we believed that God walked in human shoes so as to allow us to be merely human, but call us to be merely human in the very best way that we can.
  And we are human in the very best way when we do the impossible, when we have the creative imagination to go out of ourselves and into each other and into our world with empathy, compassion and that great eleventh commandment, Love one another.
  Let us continue to keep at doing the impossible; for me, it means escaping Phil’s world to be in your world, with you and for you.  Escaping our individual worlds to reach the impossible but mystical state of empathy and compassion.
  It begins when we can all encounter the greatness of the sublime and when humility comes easy when our adoration is won by the experience of One who is greater.  The greatness of God gives us reason to do the impossible; to go out of ourselves and into the realm of empathy and love.
  Let us go forth and anthropomorphize…I’ve got news for you.  That all we can do, be merely human, but let us do it the best way, let us do the impossible.  Love one another.  Amen.
  

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Jesus, the Peripatetic Wisdom Teacher in the Stoa


4 Easter   C       April 21, 2013           
Acts 9:36-43 Ps.23
Rev 7:9-17  John 10:22-30



  Being among good Christian folks such as yourselves and as people who are well-informed about your faith, I would like to pose some questions seeking short answers of the one word variety, yes or no.   Is Jesus the Good Shepherd?  Yes?  Is Jesus the Lamb of God?  Yes?  Well, now you have me really confused?  Can Jesus be both Shepherd and Lamb?  Is that acknowledging contradictory metaphors?
  It is indeed and it is no problem for language users.  We do amazing things with language.  Such contradictions only show the limits of any metaphor but it shows how versatile we are as metaphor makers and users as we continuously look to receive and create new metaphorical insight about our faith in the art of living.
  We use language to transform geography.  We use language to relocate cities.  By the time the Gospel of John was coming to significant textual form, the city of Jerusalem had been destroyed.  Members of the various religious parties of Judaism had to flee Jerusalem.  Some Jews went to Jamnia and they began a program to purify Judaism of all Hellenistic influences.  Other members who were following the teaching of Rabbi Jesus were forced out of Jerusalem and other parts of Israel as well. 
  Some scholars believe that the chief writing agents of the Gospel of John ended up in Ephesus.  Ephesus was an ancient city that was the largest city in the Roman Asia province.
  How does language recreate geography?  Some say that followers of Jesus in Ephesus referred to that city as a New Jerusalem.  In the migration of people resettling in a new location, we are well aware of people bring the location names of their native countries to their new place of residence.  People love their homelands; even though economic conditions and hostilities drive them from their lands they have enough nostalgia for the homeland to try to remake it in the new place.
   Ephesus as Jerusalem is quite a stretch though.  Unlike the Jewish purists who tried to restore their religion to a purity without Hellenistic influence; the followers of Jesus in Ephesus as we know them from the writing of the Gospel of John did exactly the opposite of the Jewish purists.  They sought to find a way for cultural aspects of the Greco-Roman world to be baptized and used in the presentation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  One of the ways to resist the world was to take methods of the world and baptize them for the presentation of the Gospel.  This was an engaging method of evangelism and it has accounted for the greater success of the various forms of the Christian faith in comparison to the worldwide success of the spread of the Jewish faith.
  We find in the appointed Gospel lesson a scenario that mixes a cultural presentation with a seeming historical event.  It would seem as though Jesus is walking in the portico of Solomon at the Temple in Jerusalem and he is in dialogue with Jewish interlocutors.
  Does anyone find it strange that Jesus is presented as being questioned by the Jews?  In his own time, it really would be just one Jew, Jesus talking with other Jews.  But how does it happen in the Gospel of John that Jesus is talking now to “Jews?”  Suddenly the Jews were presented as foreign enemies of Jesus.  This presentation should tell us how Gentile the Christian movement had become even while there were some Jewish patriarchs of the Jesus movement who were trying to translate the Judaic context in ways so that it could be grasped by the larger number of Gentile persons who were following Jesus.
  There are specific presentation elements that would give us an indication of a marriage between Athens and Jerusalem.  John is written in the koine or common Greek that was left over from the conquering of the world by Alexander the Great.  Alexander tried to bring the Greek polis to the entire world.  Local residents would speak their own native language but would learn a common Greek for politics and commerce.  This low Greek, lingua franca became the language of choice for writing the New Testament.
  The Greek world for portico is StoaStoa or porch was the place where the founder of the Stoic philosophy began to do his public teaching.  Jesus was walking and discussing in the stoa, a colonnade walkway that ran the length of one side of the Temple complex.  The Greek philosophical school of note occurred in the colonnade walk ways called “parapatoi.”  The philosophers eventually were called the Peripatetic school or those who taught by walking about.  This is the very Greek word used for what Jesus was doing in the portico of Solomon; he was walking and in dialogue. (περιπατέω peripateō )  This image would have recognizable symbolic meaning for the Gentiles of Ephesus.
  The Peripatetic School was the classical graduate school of Greek philosophy.  A student or disciple would gather around a known teacher or philosopher who held court on the porch as he walked and taught.  And one can see the conscious blending of teacher from the Greek wisdom perspective with the Hebraic notion of the shepherd.  David was the quintessential shepherd but in the Gospel of John, Shepherd and Sheep is presented as this intimate relationship between master and devotee, teacher and student.  And this notion would find a hearing in the Gentile Greco-Roman world that had this long tradition of graduate school for advanced learners.
  In the Gospel of John, Jesus was presented as the wisdom teacher par excellence.  None of the other Gospels has the long teaching discourses like the Gospel of John does.  The Gospel of John presents to the readers an occasion to identify with the disciples as they progressively learn to follow their teacher and come to understand the inner wisdom of his teaching.  The Gospel of John is founded upon a blend between the Hebraic and Greek wisdom traditions.  The chokmath or Sophia of the book of Proverbs is seen as the eternal word or logos in the Gospel of John.  In the beginning was the Logos, the Word.  There are few words that are more directly from the Greek wisdom perspective than the word logos.  And John’s Gospel is built around the Logos.
  Logos is so pervasive and so versatile it allows the full play of metaphors for evocative purposes; purposes of evoking insights to influence and change our life and help us live better.  So indeed, Jesus can be a wisdom Shepherd of God but also a Lamb whose life expresses the essence of sacrifice, of laying down his life for others as a way of celebrating a relationship with God.
  John the Divine in his vision of the end sees irony; the Lamb in the center will also be the Shepherd.  Being a shepherd comes through sacrifice.   Sacrifice or laying down of our lives for each other is what rises to the top of all value.  Sacrifice or giving of one’s life is what makes the Shepherd worthy of the sheep.  A teacher who shares all is what makes a teacher worthy of the student.
  If Jesus was the Good Shepherd who had sheep who knew and heard his voice; it is also true to say that his sheep went on to be shepherds and wisdom teachers.  They too made disciples; the end and teaching of their lives was to bring salvation or health.  In the story of the rising of Dorcas one finds the essence of the dynamic purpose of shepherd; it is to restore people into the conditions of service.  Dorcas’ life was characterized by service and she lost it but with Peter’s ministry she was restore to being able to serve.  This parable is metaphorical of the function of those who are trained in the wisdom tradition of Jesus.  We are called to enable each other to serve.  We are truly unhealthy when we do not serve.  Health is being able to serve.
  The Gospel of John is a successful wedding of Jerusalem and Athens; it is a blending of Hebraic wisdom tradition within the language forms of the Greek wisdom tradition.  This blending accounts for the long success of the Gospel.
  We are still blending the good news in the wisdom tradition as it can be made relevant to our lives within our post-modern world.  I am committed to this blending of the Gospel of Jesus Christ within our current time and place.  Let us be in the wisdom school of Jesus today and let our lives express the wonderful health of service.  Amen

Prayer for Pentecost, 2024

Day of Pentecost, May 19, 2024 Christ, the Eternal Word, who is also Holy Spirit coming to all the languages of the world; let the peoples o...